Friday, April 17, 2009

Young Man on a Bicycle

My sign at the Albuquerque Tea Party read "BASTA!" because I wanted to make a unique one for New Mexico, so I figured the simple Spanish word for "enough!" would be good. It was funny when I was drawing it out at the sign-making party. I drew B-A-S-T, and my daughter started asking, "What are you writing? Don't you know this is a family friendly thing?"

Well, it looks like not as many people knew Spanish as I expected. Several people asked what it meant. My daughter enjoyed waving the sign for awhile. With her body-modification -- tattoos, piercings, and brandings -- she figured people would take her as an "infiltrator." And if they didn't know what the word "basta" meant, then they might really take her as an infiltrator.

But there came a time when I had the sign.

A young man on a bicycle was passing behind us (we stood right on the edge of the curb to get the drivers' attention) and he stopped suddenly and asked me, "What does your sign say?"

"Basta. It means 'enough.'"

He nodded and started on his way, but turned back. "Enough . . . what?" He was taller than I and had to lean his head down to hear me with all the yelling and cheering going on.

"Enough spending. You know, the budget, stimulus, all that." I was yelling over the noise.

"So the spending from the previous eight years wasn't enough to justify protesting?"

"Oh, we didn't like it. We were pissed about that, starting with the prescription drug thing. My husband even changed parties over that."

"But you didn't protest."

"No," I agreed. "But Obama's spending was just SO much and SO fast, we had to do something more."

"If it hadn't been Obama, would you have protested?"

I tried to answer him honestly. I mean this young man was listening to my answers and asking good questions -- something I crave to get from liberals around me. So I said, "I think whoever it was, if he went more slowly, we might not have protested. We would still think we could do something about it. But this happened so fast."

"So if Obama had spent more slowly, you might not have protested?"

"Possibly. If he'd spent more slowly and not so much at once."

He nodded and thanked me, mounted his bike and rode on.

But now I have more to say. You know how it is. Only hours, if not days, after the event, you think of what you should have said.

I would have said, had I had my wits about me at that point, that we conservatives don't protest. That's the domain of liberals. They'll protest and demonstrate at the drop of a hat. I bet they all have a protest kit made up and sitting next to the door just in case they decide to protest and get the call. We conservatives, on the other hand, call our representatives, write letters to them and to the editor of local papers, send emails, voice our opinions on talk radio, and try to make changes through the voting process. We don't even think of protesting. That's almost as foreign to us as suing someone for offending us, as foreign as using the courts to make social and legal change.

When Heather Wilson supported the SCHIPS bill and was on Jim Villanucci's show, people blasted her. I blasted her in an email.

I can't tell you how pissed I was that Bush went ahead and signed the TARP bill, in spite of the "no" vote of Congress. This was stomping on the constitution, as far as I was concerned. But he was on his way out. No use "firing" him! I had to focus my energy on what was happening after that.

The fact that there were . . . it seemed like 5,000 conservatives (pretty much all fiscal conservatives -- some Republicans, some Libertarians, some Independents, even some Democrats) there doing something they don't usually do should say we're really, really mad. And we're serious. And when our usual methods seemed to have no effect on the conduct of Congress and the White House, we were driven to protesting.

Not that I regret it. It was a blast. But I wonder if our politicians heard us, or if they're covering their ears with their hands and going, "La, la, la, la, la!"

2 comments:

  1. Those were good points that you made to the young man, even if you thought of a better explanation later.

    Please don't take this wrongly, but . . .
    most "liberals" (I dislike the term, but we both know what is meant by it) . . .
    anyway, most liberals do not protest either. Like you, they have been mostly going along and living their lives, hoping that the politicians will get on with taking care of things.

    If you are thinking of the people who have protest kits by the door--those are the radicals (socialists, communists, Maoists, etc.--they are not united and they fight over labels). They tend to be quite far left of liberal. Think of it this way, JFK (who was a Hawk and a fiscal conservative) was a liberal. LBJ--a New Dealer--was to the left of JFK. The radicals (they have been calling themselves progressives since the '40's because it sounds more innocuous) are far to the left of either of these. Not all of them are statists either. There are progressive anarchists and progressive Maoists and Leninists. Anarchists are not statists, but the Maoists and Leninists definitely are!

    None of the radicals are mainstream Americans, and neither are the "far right" groups such as John Birchers and the Aryan Brotherhood. Some of these do protest, but rarely. (Since the leader of the American Nazi Party was born at the hospital I worked at during college, I did see the American Nazis March down Main Street of Bloomington, IL on his birthday each year and lay a wreath at the hospital; that institution was always in lock-down at the time).

    On the other hand, the people you call liberals are, as are the people you call conservative. Most of the American political spectrum is close to center, which is why the right-left dichotomy of the French revolution does not really fit. In fact, it fits so poorly that we get confused, calling Nazi's rightists, when they are actually National Socialists making them leftist.

    I suppose eventually we will iron out the term for the patriot groups--but rather than limit ourselves with terminology that does not fit anyway, I think it is a good idea to cast a wide circle by simple adhering to the 9-12 principles and values.

    Did they hear us? No. Given the White House Statement, I think they were very busy pretending they had never heard of us!

    Remember Ghandi: First they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you for clarifying. Yeah, I was using "liberal" to mean people like Obama and ACORN radicals, but I suspect there are a lot of people who voted for him who are now going, "Whaaa-?" and feeling like their party has left them.

    I love your Ghandi quote.

    ReplyDelete